Global warming must be real! After all we even failed presidential candidates who says thus and have top scientists. With 86% of Europeans polled saying that they “[believe] that humans [are] a direct cause of climate change, and 45 percent considered it could be a risk to them and their loved ones within their lifetimes. Sixty-eight percent said they would either strongly or somewhat support limits on their purchasing and conduct in support of fighting global warming” it is just an issue of time for the cynical Americans to fall victim to more government control. Those polled said it all, they’d be “either strongly or somewhat support constraints on their…conduct” in order to curb a climate danger. This stat is quite frightening, not due to the climate threat, but on account of the susceptibility such beliefs have upon independence. By examining the character of scientific studies, past theories, and the current evidence for global warming, it will become evident that global warming is just not a definitive theory, as well as a legitimate one at that, and that the only goal of this kind of theory would be to enable government to regulate and control every aspect of our lives.
To clearly understand the sole reason for the concept of global warming is to control us, we must look at a few of the fundamental history of the theory. With reports of 12% increases in ice and snow in the northern hemisphere, temperature drops of 2.4 degrees Fahrenheit since 1940, droughts, cold winters and a whole range of climate irregularities, the conclusion was that of a global cooling.
The s nearly no one has even heard of global cooling when we jump forward a few decades, and global warming is the most recent notion. Once again the evidence is lacking, a large amount of it’s questionable as well as the single alternative with this is for the fearful citizens of the planet to give up some liberties to be able to fight pollution, CO2 emissions, destruction of resources that will combat the heating… The list will not finish.
Because the theory of global warming has seen some challenges from an increasing number of scientists, the name has once again switched. Now, as even the EPA’s site lists it, it’s called “Global Climate Change.” While it has not been demonstrated global climates are changing, it is vague enough to cover any climate routine that might appear irregular or unexpected, when in fact chance or timing may be responsible rather compared to the disaster of climate change.